Is your site breaking the European Accessibility Act?
Paste a URL. We open the page in a real browser, run the axe-core test suite against it, and map every failure to the clause of EN 301 549 it puts at risk. No signup, no install.
Starting…
This usually takes 10 to 25 seconds. We load your page in a real browser, so it takes about as long as opening it yourself. Please don't close the tab.
What you get. Every machine-detectable failure on the page, each one with the element that caused it, a screenshot of that element, the markup, and what to change. Findings are mapped to EN 301 549 clause 9, the technical standard behind the Act.
One page per scan. Nothing is stored beyond the report itself, and reports expire on their own.
What this test can and cannot tell you
It is an automated test, and automated testing finds a minority of accessibility problems. How big a minority is genuinely contested: about 30% of WCAG success criteria can be meaningfully automated at all, while Deque, who make the engine used here and so have an interest in the answer, report 57% of individual issues on first-time audits.
So: a clean result means nothing machine-detectable was found. It never means "compliant", and this tool will not tell you that it does. What it is very good at is the concrete, unarguable things: missing text alternatives, contrast, form labels, ARIA misuse, heading structure. That is also most of what an inspector opens the page and checks first.
What the standard actually asks for
EN 301 549 clause 9 is WCAG 2.1 Level AA. Who the Act covers is narrower than most articles suggest, and the penalties are not the numbers usually quoted. Read the plain-English version.